 |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
|
|
|
Beetar, J. T., & Williams, J. M. (1995). Malingering response
styles on the memory assessment scales and symptom validity tests.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10(1), 57-72.
Bernard, L. C., McGrath, M. J., & Houston, W. (1993). Discriminating
between simulated malingering and closed head injury on the Wechsler
Memory Scale-Revised. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,
8(6), 539-552..
Bigler, E. D. (1986). Forensic issues in neuropsychology. In
D. Wedding, A. M. Horton, & J. Webster (Eds.), The neuropsychology
handbook: Behavioral and clinical perspectives (pp. 526-547).
New York: Springer.
Binder, L., & Willis, S. C. (1991). Assessment of motivation
after financially compensable minor head trauma. Psychological
assessment, 3, 175-181.
Brodsky, S. L. (1977). The mental health professional on the
witness stand: A survival guide. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology
in the Legal Process (pp. 269-276). New York: Spectrum Publications.
Brodsky, S. L. (1989). Advocacy in the guise of scientific objectivity:
An examination of Faust and Ziskin. Computers in Human Behavior,
5, 261-264.
Brodsky, S. L. (1991). Testifying in court: Guidelines and
maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Cooke, D. J. (1990). Do I feel lucky? Survival in the witness
box. Neuropsychology, (4), 271-285.
Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology
and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31-35.
Faust, D. (1991). Forensic neuropsychology: The art of practicing
a science that does not yet exist. Neuropsychology Review,
2, 205-231.
Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments
and instruments. New York: Plenum Press.
Heaton, R. K., Smith, H., Lehman, R., & Vogt, A. T. (1978).
Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological
testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46,
892-900.
Hiscock, M., & Hiscock, C. K. (1989). Refining the forced-choice
method for the detection of malingering. Journal of Clinical
and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(6), 967-974.
Hoffman, B. F. (1986). How to write a psychiatric report for
litigation following personal injury. American Journal of Psychiatry,
143, 164-169.
Hoffman, B. F., & Spiegel, H. (1989). Legal principles in
the psychiatric assessment of personal injury litigants. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 304-310.
Klawans, H. L. (1991). Trials of an expert witness. Boston:
Little, Brown and Company.
Kreutzer, J., Leininger, B., & Harris, J. (1990). The evolving
role of neuropsychology in community integration. Community
Integration following traumatic brain injury (pp. 49-66).
Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing.
Kreutzer, J., Marwitz, J., & Myers, S. (1991). Neuropsychological
issues in litigation following brain injury. Neuropsychology,
4(4), 249-259.
Larrabee, G. J. (1990). Cautions in the use of neuropsychological
evaluation in legal settings. Neuropsychology, (4), 239-247.
Lee, G. P., Loring, D. W., & Martin, R. C. (1992). Rey's
15-item visual memory test for the detection of malingering: Normative
observations on patients with neurological disorders. Psychological
Assessment, 4(1), 43-46.
Lees-Haley, P. R., & Brown, R. S. (1993). Neuropsychological
complaint base rates of 170 personal injury claimants. Archives
of Clinical Neuropsychology, 8(3), 185-202.
Levy, A. (1992). Compensation neurosis rides again. Brain
Injury, 6(5), 401-410.
Loftus, E., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the defense:
The accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who puts memory on
trial. New York: St. Martin's.
McCaffrey, R., Williams, A. D., Fisher, J., & Laing, L. C.
(1993). Forensic issues in mild brain injury. Journal of
Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8(3), 38-47.
Matarazzo, J. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological
testing: Validation from Binet to the school, clinic, and courtroom.
American Psychologist, 45, 999-1017.
Mendelson, G. (1988). Psychiatric aspects of personal injury
claims. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. The Neurolaw Letter, published by HDI Publishers, Post Office Box 131401, Houston, Texas 77219
(a monthly newsletter for attorneys and health care providers concerned with the medicolegal ramifications
of brain and spinal cord injuries).
Niles, K. J., & Sweet, J. J. (1994). Neuropsychological assessment
and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9(6), 501-552.
Rogers, R. (1984). Toward an empirical model of malingering and
deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 93-111.
Romano, J. L. (1992). Legal issues in testimony about post-concussive
syndrome: A matter of proof. In L. J. Horn & N. D. Zasler,
N. D. (Eds.), Rehabilitation of post-concussive disorders.
State of the art reviews (pp. 193-202). Philadelphia:
Hanley & Belfus.
Ruff, R. M., Wylie, T., & Tennant, W. (1993). Malingering
and malingering-like aspects of mild closed head injury. Journal
of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8(3), 60-73.
Sbordone, R. (1991). Neuropsychology for the attorney. Orlando,
FL: Paul Deutsch.
Shapiro, D. L. (1991). Forensic psychological assessment:
An integrative approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sparr, L., & Pankratz, L. D. (1983). Factitious post-traumatic
stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1016-1019.
Taraska, J. M. (1989). Legal guide for physicians. Albany,
NY: Matthew Bender & Company. J. Sherrod Taylor, Neurolaw: Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1997)
(a book exploring the medicolegal implications of neurological injuries).
Wedding, D., & Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision
making in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,
4(3), 233-265.
Ziskin, J., & Faust, D. (1988). Coping with psychiatric
and psychological testimony (Vols. 1-3, 4th ed.). Marina
del Rey, CA: Law and Psychology Press. 
|
|
This Site is Hosted By For Questions or comment, please email Jenny Marwitz For problems with this site, please email Webmaster Last updated - 10/02/2008
|
